Back to the fields

Biology and protein engineering: completion history

All area pages | Area definition | Scoring rubric

Created November 7, 2026. The three earlier snapshots are retrospective judgment-based estimates, not scores recorded at the time. The current assessment is unchanged. Historical confidence is very low; current confidence is low. Zero can indicate an evidence gap rather than absent capability.

Chart layout updated November 8, 2026: one graph with four dated lines. Scores and assessment dates are unchanged. Overlapping lines indicate equal values; point labels show November 7, 2026. The table below contains every date's exact values.

Completion graph with four dated lines

Scalable graph | Combined 14-page report

Percentage estimates

Measurable outcomeNov 7, 2025 (reconstructed)May 7, 2026 (reconstructed)Oct 7, 2026 (reconstructed)Nov 7, 2026 (saved)
Design success40%40%40%40%
Functional prediction25%30%30%30%
Generalization20%25%25%25%
Research efficiency20%20%30%30%
Structural accuracy45%45%45%45%
Useful novelty25%25%25%25%

Reconstruction notes and component scores

Components below are execution / breadth / agenda-setting / validation / sustained autonomous improvement, each out of 20. Their sum gives the percentage. The component values are judgments, not published statistics. Source links document evidence available by the cutoff, not the numerical estimate itself. The source section lists availability dates and version caveats. No area-wide average is calculated.

Design success

The experimental binder evidence was published in August 2025. No later comparable all-design functional success series justifies a changed judgment.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 40%bind
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 40%bind
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 40%bind
2026-11-07 (saved)15 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 40%Original score and evidence

Functional prediction

The preview supports limited genomic prediction in 2025. The January 2026 evaluation adds breadth, while prospective calibration remains unestablished.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%genome25
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)10 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 30%genome
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)10 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 30%genome
2026-11-07 (saved)10 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 30%Original score and evidence

Generalization

The initial preview supplies a narrow transfer proxy; the peer-reviewed holdout evaluation supports execution credit by May without proving broad cross-condition transfer.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)5 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 20%genome25
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%genome
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%genome
2026-11-07 (saved)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%Original score and evidence

Research efficiency

Binder design provides an earlier workflow proxy, not end-to-end efficiency. August characterization throughput supports a higher execution and repeated-operation judgment.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)5 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 20%bind
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)5 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 20%bind
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 30%sapp
2026-11-07 (saved)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 5 = 30%Original score and evidence

Structural accuracy

The joint-structure result predates all snapshots. The same prospective verification and autonomy gaps persist.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 10 / 5 = 45%fold
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 10 / 5 = 45%fold
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)15 / 10 / 5 / 10 / 5 = 45%fold
2026-11-07 (saved)15 / 10 / 5 / 10 / 5 = 45%Original score and evidence

Useful novelty

Functional designed binders were already demonstrated. Sequence novelty still does not establish a new biological function, so no time-based increase is assigned.

Assessment dateComponent pointsEvidence used
2025-11-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%bind
2026-05-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%bind
2026-10-07 (reconstructed)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%bind
2026-11-07 (saved)10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0 = 25%Original score and evidence

Dated sources

All sources accessed November 7, 2026. Dates below are publication or conservative availability dates, as noted.

fold | 2024-05-08 - AlphaFold 3, Nature. Joint molecular-structure prediction; structural accuracy does not establish biological function.

genome25 | 2025-06-25 - AlphaGenome preview. Initial predictive genomics system; January 2026 update excluded from the 2025 assessment.

bind | 2025-08-27 - BindCraft, Nature. Experimentally tested protein binders; not autonomous selection of new biological functions.

genome | 2026-01-28 - AlphaGenome, Nature. Regulatory variant-effect evaluation; prospective cross-context validity still limited.

sapp | 2026-08-20 - Protein design validation platform, Nature Communications. Specialized protein characterization throughput; full functional validation cost unmeasured.

Future updates

Keep these reconstructions separate from subsequently recorded observations. Append new dated assessments with changed component scores and source evidence; do not silently replace historical reasoning. The shared historical-method notes describe how these snapshots were made.