Back to all fields

Chemistry

Can AI plan and run experiments that improve quality, reduce waste and scale up?

26%

field summary estimate

6 outcomes · Assessed November 7, 2026 · Low confidence

The field estimate averages its outcome scores. It is a reading aid, not a measured fraction of the field that AI manages.

How the estimate built up.

Each band is one outcome's share of the field estimate, so the top line is the estimate itself. Every field starts at 0% on December 31, 2022. Dates before the latest are retrospective estimates. Point at a band to see that outcome's score on each date.

0%10%20%30%40%Yield and selectivity. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 30%; May 7, 2026: 35%; October 7, 2026: 35%; November 7, 2026: 35%Transfer and scale. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 30%; May 7, 2026: 30%; October 7, 2026: 30%; November 7, 2026: 30%Substantial novelty. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 15%; May 7, 2026: 15%; October 7, 2026: 15%; November 7, 2026: 15%Route execution. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 30%; May 7, 2026: 30%; October 7, 2026: 30%; November 7, 2026: 30%Process burden. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 10%; May 7, 2026: 10%; October 7, 2026: 10%; November 7, 2026: 10%Experimental efficiency. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 30%; May 7, 2026: 35%; October 7, 2026: 35%; November 7, 2026: 35%0.0%December 31, 2022: field estimate 0.0%24.2%November 7, 2025: field estimate 24.2% (reconstructed)25.8%May 7, 2026: field estimate 25.8% (reconstructed)October 7, 2026: field estimate 25.8% (reconstructed)25.8%November 7, 2026: field estimate 25.8%Dec 31, 2022Nov 7, 2025May 7, 2026Nov 7, 2026
View exact historical values and reconstruction notes

What we measure

Each percentage is a judgment about progress toward independent advancement. Open the evidence to inspect the basis for it.

Experimental efficiency

35%estimated progress

What we track

Number of experiments, elapsed days, human hours, and total dollars to meet a frozen yield and purity specification.

Why this estimate?

A logged optimization campaign and instrument feedback support bounded automated experimentation. Full campaign economics and autonomous choice of research directions remain gaps.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Affordable optimization platform; full campaign metric incomplete. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

2026 publication: In photocatalytic isotope-labeling case study 3, optimization used seven initial experiments followed by 30 optimization iterations. RoboChem-Flex, Nature Synthesis.

Interpretation and tracking value

This gives a 37-experiment campaign baseline (project sum), not all-in dollars or time to an independently reproduced specification. Hardware affordability alone is not campaign efficiency.

Next comparable measurement

Run matched optimization campaigns; count failed experiments, consumables, analytics, operator time and elapsed days until the same specification is reached. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Process burden

10%estimated progress

What we track

Kilograms of waste per kilogram of product, solvent use, energy per batch, and total production cost.

Why this estimate?

Affordable automation is an enabling step, but no verified waste, energy or production-cost improvement per qualified kilogram is established in the baseline.

Advancements

  • Synthia-planned API route lifts overall yield from 8% to 26%October 2, 2024. For a helicase-primase inhibitor, a Synthia-proposed and experimentally validated route gave 26% overall yield versus 8% for the patented route, with building-block cost about 556-fold lower; a human-refined version reached 35% in six steps instead of seven and raised the GreenMotion score from 0 to 18. An unconstrained Synthia route failed, with one step giving only about 5%. No PMI values are reported.
  • Lonza AI route scouting cuts a seven-step synthesis to four stepsMay 22, 2025. A Lonza case study of AI-enabled route scouting reduced a route from seven steps and seven isolations to four of each, cut the required starting material by 70%, found starting materials priced 50% lower and saved four to six weeks of lab time.
  • RoboChem-Flex offers lower-cost lab automationApril 13, 2026. RoboChem-Flex provides a lower-cost automation setup for reaction optimization.
Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Required process-intensity baseline unknown. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

April 13, 2026: RoboChem-Flex provides a lower-cost automation setup for reaction optimization. University of Amsterdam: RoboChem-Flex.

Interpretation and tracking value

Lower equipment purchase cost does not imply less waste, solvent, energy or production cost per kilogram. Those quantities are not established by the platform headline.

Next comparable measurement

Weigh all material inputs and waste; meter batch energy and calculate complete cost per kilogram of isolated qualified product. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Route execution

30%estimated progress

What we track

Target compounds obtained at required purity / all assigned synthesis targets, confirmed experimentally.

Why this estimate?

Computer-directed reaction execution is demonstrated on selected tasks. Reliable completion of diverse multi-step targets, purity validation and recovery still lack complete autonomous evidence.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Laboratory task demonstrations; target success denominator incomplete. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

December 20, 2023: Coscientist demonstrated planning and execution capabilities including palladium-catalysed coupling experiments. Coscientist, Nature.

Interpretation and tracking value

Selected tasks do not establish a broad fraction of assigned multi-step synthesis targets obtained at required purity. Tool execution and final compound acceptance are different endpoints.

Next comparable measurement

Assign a fixed diverse target set; verify identity, isolated purity and yield, counting all failures, manual repairs and abandoned routes. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Substantial novelty

15%estimated progress

What we track

New transformations or materially different routes accepted after literature and patent review; distinguish routine parameter tuning.

Why this estimate?

Planning and execution provide foundations, but known transformations and parameter optimization do not establish independent discovery of substantively new chemistry.

Advancements

  • Coscientist demonstrates computer-directed chemistryDecember 20, 2023. Coscientist demonstrated computer-directed chemistry using known reaction capabilities.
  • Grzybowski group's algorithm designs new multicomponent reactions2024. A computer system given reaction-mechanism knowledge and physical-organic rules autonomously designed large numbers of mechanistically distinct multicomponent reactions, predicted yields and flagged organocatalytic candidates; predictions were validated by experiments across different reactivity modes and product scaffolds. Published in Nature Communications.
Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Autonomous execution evidence; qualifying novelty count unknown. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

December 20, 2023: Coscientist demonstrated computer-directed chemistry using known reaction capabilities. Coscientist, Nature.

Interpretation and tracking value

Executing or optimizing an existing transformation does not meet the substantial-novelty rule. No qualifying count of independently adjudicated new transformations is extracted here.

Next comparable measurement

Register proposals before experimentation; obtain literature/patent review and outside experimental reproduction before counting a new route or transformation. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Transfer and scale

30%estimated progress

What we track

Success on unseen substrate families and retention of yield, purity, and reproducibility at increased scale.

Why this estimate?

An eightfold laboratory scale-up provides concrete transfer evidence. Small-scale demonstrations do not establish unseen-family success or autonomous industrial process development.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Multi-case demonstration; industrial-scale retention unknown. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

2026 publication: Case study 3 was scaled eightfold to 1 mmol, yielding isolated product at 52% yield and 64% deuterium incorporation. RoboChem-Flex, Nature Synthesis.

Interpretation and tracking value

This is laboratory scale, not industrial manufacturing or a held-out substrate-family test. Scale-up is measured, broad transfer remains unquantified.

Next comparable measurement

Hold out substrate families; repeat accepted routes at increasing batch sizes, measuring yield, purity and between-batch variability. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Yield and selectivity

35%estimated progress

What we track

Isolated yield and measured selectivity under matched conditions; distinguish isolated product from inferred instrument signal.

Why this estimate?

Closed-loop optimization and isolated product measurements support useful bounded execution. The gap between instrument and isolated yield limits claims of dependable autonomous validation.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Experimental optimization demonstrated; common numerical baseline unavailable. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

2026 publication: Case study 3 reached an instrument-estimated 70% ±10% yield and 71% deuterium incorporation; an isolated scale-up produced 52% yield with 64% incorporation. RoboChem-Flex, Nature Synthesis.

Interpretation and tracking value

Instrument estimates and isolated yields are different endpoints. Deuterium incorporation is specific to this transformation, not a generic selectivity rate.

Next comparable measurement

For each reaction report starting conditions, isolated mass/purity, selectivity and uncertainty against an expert baseline under matched conditions. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note