Back to all fields

Robotics

Can robots complete real tasks in unfamiliar places, reliably and without rescue?

29%

field summary estimate

6 outcomes · Assessed November 7, 2026 · Low confidence

The field estimate averages its outcome scores. It is a reading aid, not a measured fraction of the field that AI manages.

How the estimate built up.

Each band is one outcome's share of the field estimate, so the top line is the estimate itself. Every field starts at 0% on December 31, 2022. Dates before the latest are retrospective estimates. Point at a band to see that outcome's score on each date.

0%10%20%30%40%Useful productivity. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 20%; May 7, 2026: 20%; October 7, 2026: 30%; November 7, 2026: 30%Skill acquisition. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 25%; May 7, 2026: 30%; October 7, 2026: 30%; November 7, 2026: 30%Reliability. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 25%; May 7, 2026: 25%; October 7, 2026: 25%; November 7, 2026: 30%Intervention rate. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 25%; May 7, 2026: 25%; October 7, 2026: 25%; November 7, 2026: 30%Generalization. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 30%; May 7, 2026: 35%; October 7, 2026: 35%; November 7, 2026: 35%Complete task success. December 31, 2022: 0%; November 7, 2025: 20%; May 7, 2026: 20%; October 7, 2026: 20%; November 7, 2026: 20%0.0%December 31, 2022: field estimate 0.0%24.2%November 7, 2025: field estimate 24.2% (reconstructed)25.8%May 7, 2026: field estimate 25.8% (reconstructed)October 7, 2026: field estimate 27.5% (reconstructed)29.2%November 7, 2026: field estimate 29.2%Dec 31, 2022Nov 7, 2025May 7, 2026Nov 7, 2026
View exact historical values and reconstruction notes

What we measure

Each percentage is a judgment about progress toward independent advancement. Open the evidence to inspect the basis for it.

Complete task success

20%estimated progress

What we track

Fully completed tasks / all assigned trials, judged against observable end states rather than partial motion success.

Why this estimate?

A structured long-horizon evaluation supports bounded task assessment, but partial credit is not complete physical-task success and no verified whole-task rate was extracted.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Benchmark protocol; whole-task rate not verified. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

2026 challenge; accessed November 7, 2026: BEHAVIOR 2026 evaluates long-horizon household activities using average partial-credit BDDL task success. BEHAVIOR 2026 official challenge.

Interpretation and tracking value

Its primary aggregate is not the fraction of trials completing every required end state. A current whole-task completion rate was not verified from the accessible challenge page.

Next comparable measurement

Archive trial-level results and count only complete end states; report successes/all assignments separately from partial credit and simulation versus physical tests. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Generalization

35%estimated progress

What we track

Success on unseen buildings, object variants, layouts, and disturbances without retraining for the individual test.

Why this estimate?

Cross-robot and compositional demonstrations support useful transfer. Coaching, related training episodes and selected tasks limit claims of independent unfamiliar-environment performance.

Advancements

  • RT-2 vision-language-action model generalizes to novel objects in 6,000 trials28 July 2023. The RT-2 vision-language-action model, evaluated in 6,000 robot trials, showed significantly improved generalization to novel objects and could follow commands absent from the robot training data, such as placing an object onto a particular number or icon.
  • Open X-Embodiment: RT-X shows positive transfer across 22 robotsOctober 13, 2023. A 21-institution collaboration released a dataset from 22 different robots covering 527 skills and 160,266 tasks, and showed that an RT-X model trained on it exhibits positive transfer, improving multiple robots' capabilities using experience from other platforms.
  • pi0.5 performs long-horizon cleaning tasks in entirely new homes22 April 2025. The pi0.5 vision-language-action model, co-trained on data from multiple robots, web data and semantic prediction, performed long-horizon dexterous tasks such as cleaning a kitchen or bedroom in entirely new homes, which the authors describe as a first for an end-to-end learned system.
  • pi0.7 transfers skills across robotsApril 16, 2026. pi0.7 demonstrates compositional tasks and cross-robot transfer; novel appliance use can improve with step-by-step language coaching.
Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Developer demonstration of transfer. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

April 16, 2026: pi0.7 demonstrates compositional tasks and cross-robot transfer; novel appliance use can improve with step-by-step language coaching. Physical Intelligence: pi0.7.

Interpretation and tracking value

Coached performance is not unassisted zero-shot success. Existing related training episodes and test-time guidance must be disclosed.

Next comparable measurement

Freeze unseen sites, layouts and objects; report complete success before and after coaching, with interventions and training overlap documented. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Intervention rate

30%estimated progress

What we track

Human rescues, remote-control episodes, and instruction corrections per 100 tasks, with labor minutes.

Why this estimate?

A laboratory executes complex workflows, yet people still replenish supplies and maintain equipment. Missing complete intervention logs prevent high autonomy credit.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Autonomous laboratory workflow; support-rate denominator unknown. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

November 4, 2026: AutoDNA integrates more than 20 instrument types; people still perform maintenance and replenish reagents and labware. AutoDNA, Nature.

Interpretation and tracking value

The report supports substantial automation but does not establish rescues or human minutes per 100 tasks for this project's metric.

Next comparable measurement

Log routine replenishment, setup, troubleshooting and remote control separately; report interventions and labor per 100 complete protocols. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Reliability

30%estimated progress

What we track

Operating hours between failures, recovery success, damage events, and task abandonment rate.

Why this estimate?

A large number of executed steps shows operational capability, but does not measure attempted steps, failures or hours between failures.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Large execution demonstration; failure-rate metric unknown. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

November 4, 2026: AutoDNA reports executing more than 11,000 experimental steps. AutoDNA, Nature.

Interpretation and tracking value

Steps executed are not operating hours between failures or a denominator of attempted steps. A successful demonstration cannot establish a zero-failure rate.

Next comparable measurement

Publish operating hours, attempted/completed steps, recoveries, damage and abandonment; include maintenance downtime and confidence intervals. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Skill acquisition

30%estimated progress

What we track

Demonstrations, robot-hours, and human hours required to learn a new task to a prespecified reliability target.

Why this estimate?

Learning from language coaching supports new-task acquisition with less teleoperation. Human teaching effort and time to a fixed reliability level remain unknown.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Learning from language coaching demonstrated. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

April 16, 2026: The developer reports training a high-level policy from repeated language coaching to execute an appliance task without additional teleoperation. Physical Intelligence: pi0.7.

Interpretation and tracking value

No complete demonstrations/robot-hours/human-hours-to-fixed-reliability baseline is established by that example. No new teleoperation does not mean no human teaching.

Next comparable measurement

Track every demonstration and coaching minute; evaluate held-out trials until a prespecified success rate is reached, counting unsuccessful training runs. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note

Useful productivity

30%estimated progress

What we track

Accepted physical outputs per hour and fully loaded dollars per output, including setup, maintenance, supervision, and depreciation.

Why this estimate?

Automated characterization increases specialized throughput, but accepted functional output per full dollar and unsupervised operation across settings are unmeasured.

Advancements

Read the dated findings and sources

Status: Physical workflow throughput proxy. Sources accessed November 7, 2026. This is a documentary baseline, not an independent replication or an assertion of the worldwide best result. An unknown measurement is not zero.

Dated findings

August 20, 2026: SAPP reports hundreds of protein designs characterized per day in an automated experimental workflow. Protein design validation platform, Nature Communications.

Interpretation and tracking value

This is a specialized laboratory throughput result, not general household/manufacturing productivity or fully loaded dollars per accepted functional output.

Next comparable measurement

Measure externally accepted outputs per operating hour and total cost including supervision, failures, maintenance, consumables and depreciation. Preserve this dated observation; append future results with their model/system version, denominator, budget and evidence level rather than overwriting it.

Open the full research note